Opinion Show more Opinion links. The claimant explained that her work permit had to be transferred to permit her to work for H3PL and she could not start work until the company sponsored her. The failure to allow the employee to transfer to a different office was discrimination on these grounds and the gossip was intimidating, hostile, degrading or humiliating, and was not prevented by the employer and did constitute harassment. There had been capability or performance management procedures a number of times culminating in a final written warning. The BT employee was disciplined for poor performance. However this must be approached carefully so that the terms of the policy do not constitute marital discrimination in themselves.
This means that she could recover the full amount of loss from the employer or any of the individual respondents.
Nike hit with lawsuit from four women who allege gender discrimination
The EAT therefore held that she had not been discriminated against. The case was at Employment Tribunal level only and does not bind other tribunals, but it is a useful reminder to employers of how the law can be applied if menopausal symptoms are not taken seriously. Publish an explanation for amendment of policy about earrings, and an apology for delay in resolving the issue. Her employment was terminated on the basis that her employment contravened an instruction to the CEO that the employer should not to engage any family members of the board. San Francisco County Superior Court. Explore our related content.